On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 17:08 +0000, ael via Tagging wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:29:52AM -0800, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Another argument against use of hazard=* for rapids is that the > > hazard key > > has been used almost always with highway=* features, not waterways. > > Not in my part of the world. Why try to restrict the scope > artificially? > Hazard in British English (and all other dialects, I suspect) is a > general term with no particular connotation with roads or even paths. > Why force us to invent a new tag "hazard_not_on_a_highway" ??? > Very true, but if you a a canoeist then rapids are an attraction not a hazard at all.
Phil (trigpoint) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging