sent from a phone > On 1 Oct 2022, at 12:22, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote > > So I don't know about the OP's country's laws, but I would suggest > looking at legal definitions of roads, and tending to unclassified for > legal roads and service for things that are not legally roads, if that > makes sense locally. In Massachusetts, US, it totally makes sense. > makes mostly sense to me, for unclassified it is perfectly in line, while for service there are cases around here where the way is legally a public way (although not necessarily a road, e.g. in historic settlements where widths are so narrow that regular cars, despite of having the formal rights, cannot physically pass), and others where it is not Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified,... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassif... stevea
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. uncla... stevea
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. u... Kevin Broderick
- Re: [Tagging] service ... gyotoku810
- Re: [Tagging] service ... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. u... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. uncla... Warin
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. u... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service ... Volker Schmidt
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassif... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conf... Shawn K. Quinn
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified,... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conf... Timeo Gut
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified,... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified,... Warin
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassif... Greg Troxel
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conf... Florian Lohoff
- Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified,... Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
