Vào lúc 07:16 2022-10-12, Marc_marc đã viết:
approving that "historic=* is about "with historical significance"
doesn't change anything about already existing historic=value
without historical significance. existing tags always remain
unless someone has the courage to try to make progress on the issue
and depreciated a specific tag is a completely different matter
from approving a key.
it will simply help the creation of the next historic=value
to be done with the right key instead of believing that it is
positive to have a mess in the historic key
Keys that go through the feature proposal process are usually either
freeform keys, accepting arbitrary values like human-readable text or
numbers, or allow a fixed, coherent set of values.
In the latter case, there may be an escape hatch for "user-defined
values", but I don't think the implication is normally that every future
value is automatically covered by the same proposal. The approved key
proposal can inform us about whether the value fits with the rest of the
key's values -- just as an unapproved but well-written key description
page can -- but the value still needs to be considered on its own merits.
As far as I can tell, the proposal is to ratify the existing contents of
the key description page. I don't get the impression that, compared to
the status quo, approving this proposal would meaningfully change the
decision tree for someone coining a new value, or someone building an
editor or renderer for that matter. It would be a different story if
there's a controversy surrounding what tthe key description page says,
or if the proposal changes the key's scope somehow, for example to
better accommodate the everything-is-history approach of
OpenHistoricalMap. [1]
[1]
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/feature-proposal-rfc-historic/3910/10
--
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
