Good evening, Le dim. 20 nov. 2022 à 17:36, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> a écrit :
> In fact, I can imagine a variety of tags that describe much (approaching > or even achieving?) all of this: > office=utility > utility=water;sewer;garbage > utility=accepts_payment > > utility=cable_tv > utility=allows_equipment_exchange > utility=furnishes_service_equipment > utility:payment=in_person_only > utility:payment=kiosk > utility:payment=cash_only > utility:payment=accepts_checks > > Those aren’t necessarily the exact tags OSM might eventually settle upon, > but they do indicate what’s possible. Again, it’s a pretty big universe, > as “utilities” encompass more than power / energy, and there are a vast > number of ways to “deal with customers at an office.” (There’s the office > itself, what sort of services are available, when/whether it is staffed (it > may be simply a drop-box for payment), what sort of services and payments > are exchanged…). > utility=* key is already widely used and expect one single value, in every situation. Please don't introduce utility=power;gas;waste. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility I've also answered here about its usage in this proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Power_utility_office#Use_sub-key_instead I'm not sure tagging offices with utility=* is really suitable for the current definition: offices aren't involved in production, transmission, distribution or delivery of power, telecommunications, gas, whatever. All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
