Thanks fellas, both fair comments! Graeme
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 13:15, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 08:17, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 20:48, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> (admin_level 4/6/8, normally). >>> >> >> Would it work to add the admin_level= to the road to say which level of >> Government owns it? >> >> Then I would think that a search should be able to say that this is an >> AL2 highway in the country of Norway, so owned by the Norwegian Federal >> Government; while this intersection is of an AL4 primary & an AL8 tertiary >> road, therefore belonging to this "State" & this "City"? >> > > I agree with using admin_level to tag which level of government > owns/operates/maintains it however you still need to sometimes specify > which entity it is, especially if the admin boundary runs down the middle > of the road (sometimes it shared, sometimes there is an agreement between > the two) and sometimes the operator will extend outside the boundary for > example through to a bridge or intersection by agreement between the two > parties. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
