Well, to me, "type of ownership" suggests values such as "freehold";
"leasehold"; "rented", which I _don't_ think is what is intended.
I think we should avoid the word "type" if at all possible.
Regards,Peter(PeterPan99)
On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 08:07:44 BST, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 14.04.2023 00:30, stevea wrote:
</SNIP>
As a result of this discussion, I see that this is the difference between the
tags owner and ownership, so I guess that is just the convention OSM chose at
some point to differentiate. It certainly doesn't follow linguistically.
Without already knowing this is the convention, using "type of" to
differentiate between specific owner and type of owner/ownership seems entirely
legitimate to me.
Cheers,
Jens
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
