On 14/9/23 04:50, Marc_marc wrote:
Le 13.09.23 à 19:21, Jez Nicholson a écrit :
OSM addresses are physical, 'locational' addresses
ok
it is the anomalous postal addresses that need to have their own
scheme....if at all.
some mapper in France are using contact:* for that (and also
some contact:addr for a kind of number+street and sometime CP+city)
note that no (including fr) app is known for using that
and due the fact that some mappers also put physical/locational
addresses into contact:*, you can't know what this info represents
without having the other addr:* object with the same address
to compare the distance between the 2
Comparing the difference between the two and it still may not be
determined.
Perhaps
contact:postal:street=* etc. could do the job and be reasonably obvious?
Yes there would need to be a good wiki page to say that these are
postal/delivery addresses rather than the physical location of the
feature, and then changes to the addr: wiki pages ... The changes to
addr pages I see as clarification of the usual practice and normal
circumstance. He use of contact:postal:*=* would only be for the
exceptions?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
