On 5/7/25 11:27, Greg Troxel wrote:
Illia Marchenko <[email protected]> writes:
Strictly speaking, "land use" and "named places" is orthogonal entities.
Don't mix them. Just use node with place=* and name=* and area with
landuse=* but without any name=*.
Yes, land use and names are separate concepts.
This isn't correct. See, e.g., landuse=apartments, a subtag of
landuse=residential indicating an apartment complex, of which, well over
100,000 have names tagged.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Dapartments
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/residential=apartments#combinations
Neighborhoods and residential areas aren't the same thing, and shouldn't
be treated as equivalent. E.g., in my city, there is a designated
historic neighborhood with a name and explicit boundaries, spanning a
few city blocks, and two residential areas with their own names inside
it (an apartment complex with two high-rises, and a named stretch of
mid-rises).
- Justin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
