On Fri, 11 May 2001, Shawn Bayern wrote:
> That's an interesting thought. Most prior discussion I had seen focused
> on a tag that specifically wraps individual URLs. While what you describe
> would be much easier for the page author, it also might introduce some
> complications (i.e., unexpected conversions).
>
> +1 for adding it here (to response) and seeing what people think.
>
I'm fine with it, but don't forget to document the fact that it's not
foolproof :-). For example, it's unlikely that the tag will understand
JavaScript event handlers that compute URLs dynamically.
> Shawn
>
Craig
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dion Almaer wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> >
> > I thought it could be useful to have a taglib that goes through a body and
> > automatically encodes
> > urls in the body.
> >
> > <response:encodeURLs>
> > blah
> > blah
> > blah
> > <a href="http://www.foo.com";>pasjds</a>
> > </response:encodeURLs>
> >
> > http://www.foo.com will automatically have encodeURL() on it. I have
> > attached
> > the java code to kinda do this. It relies on the apache Regexp libs.
> > I think this could be a natural addition to the response package.
> >
> > Dion
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > Dion Almaer | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | voice: 720.304.3244
> > CustomWare | http://www.customware.com | fax: 360.242.0671
>
>
