On Fri, 11 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > That's an interesting thought. Most prior discussion I had seen focused
> > on a tag that specifically wraps individual URLs. While what you describe
> > would be much easier for the page author, it also might introduce some
> > complications (i.e., unexpected conversions).
> >
> > +1 for adding it here (to response) and seeing what people think.
>
> I'm fine with it, but don't forget to document the fact that it's not
> foolproof :-). For example, it's unlikely that the tag will understand
> JavaScript event handlers that compute URLs dynamically.
I agree; it should have a pretty hefty disclaimer. :-)
Shawn
