On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:46:44 -0500, Rahul P Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- Henri wrote: -- > > > Been a while, but I'm pretty sure that the released log taglib (1.0) > > uses log4j, > <snip> > > Shouldn't be that hard to release a 2.0 of the log taglib. Or 1.0 of a > > commons-logging taglib (rename the existing one), and maybe a 1.0 of a > > UGLI taglib. > <snap> > > logging.apache.org do have their UGLI (or something..JULI?) interface > > which is a competitor to clogging now. > > This is great, I'd be very happy with the second option you propose: 1.0s > of both clogging and UGLI. I suspect having the freedom to choose between > the two will be appreciated by many JSP/taglib developers down the road.
Makes sense. Some suggestion of bringing the UGLI and JCL groups together, but unsure if that'll happen or not. > For my bit, I'm happy to contribute to either or both. [it seems you have > most of it done already for clogging ;-)] Search and replace rocks :) Unsure how we would maintain separate UGLI and JCL versions. Working out the patches needed for UGLI-support (instead of JCL) would be very useful. Then we could try and figure out whether to have 2 branches, 2 modules, 2 packages in the same module etc. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
