Hmm. I'm starting to suspect that nuance folks mainly use GSL. I'm
still hoping for some help from the newsgroup posts I've made to
voxeo and bevocal, but I'm not counting on it.
If we're likely to have separate grammars I'm considering just using
GSL for nuance. RDCs still abstract the app from the grammars, and
hopefully longer term we can just use SRGS for both. It's a pain
though, since we'll need to have internationalization for RDCs to be
widely adopted, and GSL would double that work.
Anyway, what do you think about that? And do you know where I can
find any ready-to-go digit, alpha and alphanum gsl grammars? Have
you or anyone you worked with done enough with GSL to create
something quickly? I'm starting to google right now, but if you have
any resources on this, I'd appreciate it.
I agree it'd be fine to have the grammar-type/platform specified in
an init parm. The next question is where to put the grammars. What
about creating two sub dirs under .grammar, one for srgs and one for
gsl? The servlet would use the init parm to figure out which to
use. There's the issue of file name suffixes of course. If you
think this is a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at the
necessary changes.
Hopefully somebody will help us get nuance srgs to work and make the
GSL part unnecessary...though we'd still probably need the subdirs
for grammars.
Stu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
