Hi Daniel. It is confusing to me also :-)
In short, we're unable to get the interpretation to be set to a slot
by the digits or alpha grammar (or any other grammar actually). Here
are some things I've tried:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<grammar xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/06/grammar";
xmlns:nuance="http://voicexml.nuance.com/grammar";
version="1.0" mode="voice" xml:lang="en-US"
tag-format="Nuance" root="numbers"> <!-- I changed the
attributes to match Nuance docs -->
<rule id="numbers" scope="public">
<item repeat="1-50">
<item><ruleref uri="#digit"/>
<tag>assign(a strcat($a strcat(" " $return)))</tag>
</item>
</item>
<tag><![CDATA[<compatibility $a>]]></tag>
</rule>
This now compiles, but nothings shows up in the interpretation as a
property. I've also tried using an unamed slot like <=$a> with the
same problem.
The only thing that's been close is
<tag> compatibility=$a </tag>
Which creates a property in the interpretation correctly, but sets
its value to "null".
In all of the above cases the utterance is correctly recognized. But
the nBest.js isn't able to get at the semantic interpretation.
On Jun 14, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Daniel Spangler wrote:
I've kind of gotten lost in this long thread. Stu, could you re-
post the
exact problem that you are currently stuck on?
________________________________
From: Stuart D. Robertson II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 11:31 AM
To: Tag Libraries Developers List
Subject: Re: RDC: Plan B for getting Nuance to work with RDCs
None of you have any access to Nuance support? Their grammar
guide sure
shows CDATA's and assign's and sub-rules and everything that is
needed in
GrXML for us [
http://community.voxeo.com/vxml/docs/nuance20/grammar.pdf
]. There is a sample retail application on Page 181 that uses
GrXML. Have
you tried changing tag format to "Nuance" i.e. try using the
same grammar
root element as the sample shows? I guess you have tried
everything by
now.
Hmm, I didn't notice that before, and did not try it. It makes
me really wish I were home so I could try it out now (I can only
test at home b/c of the firewall at work).
Like you, I'd much prefer getting SRGS grammars working than
have to make a big switch. Ideally, we could just apply some
xslt to the main grammars (those based on the final
recommendation version of the standard, not the one from 2001
that Nuance uses). I'll test this as soon as I can and post
results. I'll also see if I can get their example working as
if. If that works, you're right...what we're trying to do isn't
really different.
Glad you like the wiki page :-). I certainly would have found
that one useful, so I suspect others will too.
Stu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________
avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0524-1, 06/14/2005
Tested on: 6/14/2005 11:30:06 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software.
______________________________________________________________________
__
This email has been scanned for all viruses by Netscalibur Mail
Scanner, powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
proactive email security service working around the clock, around
the globe, visit
http://www.netscalibur.co.uk/scanner/index.html
______________________________________________________________________
__
