DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36626>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36626 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-11 22:37 ------- Yes I agree as well. It is counter-intuitive but I'm sure there was good reason for it initially, and I guess you can see an argument both ways... as you say: the option tag does have a value, which suggest that a select tag is a key to value mapping. It's just not perhaps how we see keys from a Map & Java perspective. As Rahul said it would be an incompatible change. I find the optionLabels and optionValues a more flexible option: full control over the order of labels and no misunderstandings. The only way I can see that this change could be made would be if an additional attribute was added to the tag, eg. reverseOptions="true" but hopefully with a better name. Something along those lines would be a simple solution I believe. Thoughts? Alternative is to mark this as WONTFIX or INVALID I guess. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
