Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > Ah, I guess you didn't see this comment: > > > Oh well. I would have liked for Tahoe-LAFS v1.5.1 not to have had any > unnecessary changes or new features compared to v1.5.0, but on the > other hand I'm really glad to see this nice clean-up go in. I'll try > to make time this weekend to review it.
Oops, no, I didn't. I've been horribly behind on tahoe-dev.. maybe I'll be able to catch up next week. I think, if this patch doesn't prove to cause instability, that I'd like to leave it in place. Like you said, it's nice to see this clean-up go in, and the branch was getting untenably long (I've been working on it for a month), and was already delayed to allow 1.5.0 to ship without it, so it was a great relief to finally get it checked in and retired. sorry bout that, -Brian _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
