David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > Brian Warner wrote: >> David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: >>> I've designed a new version of the cap protocol I posted a few days >>> ago, that addresses Brian's comments about roadblock attacks. >> This is great stuff. > > It's the most fun (well, intellectual fun :-) I've had in ages. Thanks a > lot for your feedback. > >> The diagram is immensely helpful too. Some comments: >> >> * so S+T is the storage-index, and the conservative values make it 210 >> bits for immutable files and 288 bits for mutable files. > > Correct.
Actually it's the other way round: 210 bits for mutable files, 288 bits for immutable. (Mutable files can have a smaller value of t because collision resistance isn't required.) -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
