Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > I imagine that deep-immutability could be useful to > folks.
Deep immutability is not a natural cryptographic property. I don't think we should synthesize unnatural properties unless there is a clear use case, *and* there has been consideration of this use case to ask whether it arises from going about things in the wrong way to start with. If one sets to synthesizing nice, but unnatural properties, one is apt wind up with the Xanadu disease. _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
