James A. Donald wrote: > Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > > I imagine that deep-immutability could be useful to > > folks. > > Deep immutability is not a natural cryptographic property.
Arguably it is. Hash trees are "naturally" deeply immutable. In any case, deep immutability is very much a natural, and more importantly useful, property for capability systems. I don't see why it would be any less so for cryptographic capability systems like Tahoe. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
