> That's correct. We'd absolutely love it all Tahoe storage-servers and > clients could operate correctly behind NAT boxes. We haven't had the > time to design and implement the STUN/STUNT/hold-punching code yet, and > it's been lower on the priority list than everything else, but we'd > love > to have it. I'd rather see IPv6 support - same effect for V6 enabled hosts. Besides, how hard is it really to set up a port forward?
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
