Brian Warner <[email protected]> writes: > We've also been considering changing our main client-to-server protocol > away from TCP-based Foolscap and over to something else, which might > make it easier to use UDP-based STUN-like protocols.
There is bulk data, and thus we need TCP-friendly congestion control. So moving away from TCP requires reinventing it. I am unclear on the details, but is it sane to propose socks support, and that people run socks on their machines with public addresses? My such machine is running BSD so I can make it do what I want, and I don't know what one can do on typical firewall/router/802.11 devices. I gather this is blocked on twisted: http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3508
pgpz6PFDc75Zd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
