On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:35, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
2. This post to the p2p-hackers mailing list a couple of days ago in which the author, Michael Militzer, says he wants a distributed storage system which is resistant to adversarial behavior, and then seems to say that Tahoe-LAFS is designed to trust the nodes. I don't understand why he says that. Perhaps he is thinking of some sorts of advanced attacks and defenses that we don't address. Or maybe he just completely misunderstood the Tahoe-LAFS design principles. :-) http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-January/002805.html
Why hasn't someone posted to that list inquiring? (I don't follow it myself, so I excuse myself from being someone.)
4. The misunderstanding that Tahoe-LAFS puts secrets into filenames which (if I understand correctly) James Donald was under when he posted http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-January/005966.html
This reads to me as non-agreement about "what is a filename" not "what does Tahoe-LAFS do with filenames-in-sense-a".
-- Kevin Reid <http://switchb.org/kpreid/> _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
