zooko: """ This is the latest example in a string of events which has convinced
> me that we have a serious problem with our documentation and > communication (or "marketing"). We are failing to make the basic > properties clear to a large class of readers. Below I list some other > misunderstandings I've noticed. > [snip] > > 1. The anonymous-proxy-servers.net page that Greg Troxel noticed: > http://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/wiki/index.php/Tahoe-lafs-setup . > They seem to think the confidentiality properties are contingent on > the decisions of K out of N storage servers. > """ Setting K to 1, by default, would force users to consider that any security properties that Tahoe does have must come from some quality other than the erasure coding. --arc`
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
