I updated pkgsrc.  On NetBSD/i386 5.1_STABLE, "python2.6 setup.py test"
passed.  A previous installation of tahoe-lafs-1.9.1 worked, so there
seem to have been no ABI changes.

Several of the test programs have "#!/usr/bin/env python", which is
flagged as non-portable.  These seem to be generated programs not
present in the source, and should have the path to the python
interpreter found at configure time (my system has no program 'python').
But this was only a warning so I didn't worry about it.

NEWS.rst does not contain entries for 0.6.0.

I think pycryptopp is a better name than zcryptopy, and that changing
names is bad, only justified when the benefit outweighs the cost (do
package names change?  do package systems support resolving name
changes? (no...) ).

Attachment: pgpumA4T4BP4I.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev

Reply via email to