* Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > On NetBSD/i386 5.1_STABLE, "python2.6 setup.py test" passed. A > previous installation of tahoe-lafs-1.9.1 worked, so there seem to > have been no ABI changes.
Same on Slackware 13.37. > I think pycryptopp is a better name than zcryptopy, and that changing > names is bad, only justified when the benefit outweighs the cost (do > package names change? do package systems support resolving name > changes? (no...) ). I agree -- left blank, right bald
pgplMNnU3dyce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
