On 22/06/12 16:51, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > Also, it would be great to have some actual users try out 1.9.2 before > we finalize it.
Definitely! Especially if you reported/experienced a bug against 1.9.1 or earlier that has been fixed (see https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/query?milestone=1.9.2&group=resolution) we'd like you to test whether the fix works for you, but more general testing is also very much appreciated. > Users! You can do this right now if you're willing to > use darcs to fetch the source. This is actually painless -- you just > acquire darcs (http://wiki.darcs.net/Binaries) and then you run > > darcs get --lazy https://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/1.9.2 > > Then you never have to touch darcs again. > > That command takes about 60 seconds to run. > > Oh, but it might fail if the darcs binary you got is incapable of > handling HTTPS. In that case, you give up and complain to us and we'll > post some tar.gz files for you to try out... I posted a source tarball for 1.9.1a1 at https://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/snapshots/allmydata-tahoe-1.9.2a1.tar.gz (also .tar.bz2 and .zip). No SUMO or gpg signatures though. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
