On 23/06/12 03:40, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > On 22/06/12 16:51, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: >> Also, it would be great to have some actual users try out 1.9.2 before >> we finalize it. > > Definitely! Especially if you reported/experienced a bug against 1.9.1 > or earlier that has been fixed (see > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/query?milestone=1.9.2&group=resolution) > we'd like you to test whether the fix works for you, but more general > testing is also very much appreciated. > >> Users! You can do this right now if you're willing to >> use darcs to fetch the source. This is actually painless -- you just >> acquire darcs (http://wiki.darcs.net/Binaries) and then you run >> >> darcs get --lazy https://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/1.9.2 >> >> Then you never have to touch darcs again. >> >> That command takes about 60 seconds to run. >> >> Oh, but it might fail if the darcs binary you got is incapable of >> handling HTTPS. In that case, you give up and complain to us and we'll >> post some tar.gz files for you to try out... > > I posted a source tarball for 1.9.1a1 at
Sigh. This really is 1.9.*2*a1. > https://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/snapshots/allmydata-tahoe-1.9.2a1.tar.gz > > (also .tar.bz2 and .zip). No SUMO or gpg signatures though. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
