thierry dijoux <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks Paul for the reply. > Just did the test, and a "tahoe check --repair" doesn't rebalance the file. > I also try a deep-check --repair, no more success.
I suspect it would be good to have two notions of "healthy", one based on enough shares, and one based on meeting the distribution criteria. I see the "should be 1 and 1 but is 2 and 0" situation as scarier than "should be 10 on 10 servers, but is 9 on 9 servers".
pgpWzWwu7B0ZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
