On 14/02/13 15:01, Greg Troxel wrote: > > thierry dijoux <[email protected]> writes: > >> Thanks Paul for the reply. >> Just did the test, and a "tahoe check --repair" doesn't rebalance the file. >> I also try a deep-check --repair, no more success. > > I suspect it would be good to have two notions of "healthy", one based > on enough shares, and one based on meeting the distribution criteria. I > see the "should be 1 and 1 but is 2 and 0" situation as scarier than > "should be 10 on 10 servers, but is 9 on 9 servers".
That's covered by <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1784> and <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/614>. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
