What encourages people to be hosts on distributed file systems? Is Tahoe massively scalable and decentralized, or is it just distributed?
And finally, can someone post a list of the most promising/popular distributed filesystems being developed? On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Justin Stottlemyer < [email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, > There are several distributed FS's right now, Almost all are currently > replication based with relatively low small amounts of security compared > TAHOE. > > That said, both CEPH and SWIFT are both racing to incorporate erasure > coding. > > > Neither will allow for the same type or level of encryption as Tahoe, but > these massively scalable open source systems are coming along and will > probably offer some good ideas along the way. > > ORI is a new one to me, I'll be digging into it some. Thanks for posting > it to the group. > > > -- Justin > > Typos by iPhone > > On Feb 16, 2014, at 4:32 AM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This seems very interesting, but seems to lack the LA part. > > > > http://ori.scs.stanford.edu/ > > > > Perhaps a FUSE layered fs that does the LA part of tahoe without the > > replication part would be useful as an adjunct. Essentially, still have > > caps and encryption, but use 1-of-1 encoding and just put shares in one > > place, via filesystem operations. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tahoe-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
