hi, anonym wrote (31 Aug 2011 11:34:29 GMT) : > Due to popular demand (there's actually some people promoting Tails on > #i2p, but there's been much complaints about it being outdated) I've > upgraded i2p to the latest stable release (0.8 -> 0.8.8),
Great! :) > See the feature/i2p-0.8.8 branch, I wonder why you dropped into config/chroot_local-packages/ some binary packages that are available in Debian. Namely, the very same versions of junit4, junit and libhamcrest-java are part of Squeeze. Also, slightly older versions of libservice-wrapper-java, libservice-wrapper-jni and service-wrapper-java are part of Debian experimental. What prevents us from using these? Anyway, I think we should at least ping the maintainer of those packages in Debian and see if he is still interested in it, and possibly asking appropriate people (maybe some Java packaging team I guess) to take them over if needed. To end with, if not done yet, I'd like RFP bugs to be submitted to Debian for every package we ship ourselves because they're not in Debian; this seems to boil down to i2p, i2p-router and libjbigi-jni as far as i2p is concerned. Bye, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | So what? _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://boum.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev
