08/31/2011 06:01 PM, intrigeri: >> See the feature/i2p-0.8.8 branch, > > I wonder why you dropped into config/chroot_local-packages/ some > binary packages that are available in Debian. Namely, the very same > versions of junit4, junit and libhamcrest-java are part of Squeeze.
Because there was an error in my head :). Removed now. Great, another 570 KB of binary junk in the git repo! > Also, slightly older versions of libservice-wrapper-java, > libservice-wrapper-jni and service-wrapper-java are part of Debian > experimental. What prevents us from using these? Anyway, I think we > should at least ping the maintainer of those packages in Debian and > see if he is still interested in it, and possibly asking appropriate > people (maybe some Java packaging team I guess) to take them over if > needed. And another 310 KB! I honestly didn't think about checking in experimental... fixed now. In the future I will be more careful by checking for existing debian packages in similar situations. > To end with, if not done yet, I'd like RFP bugs to be submitted to > Debian for every package we ship ourselves because they're not in > Debian; this seems to boil down to i2p, i2p-router and libjbigi-jni as > far as i2p is concerned. It's underway: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448638 Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
