anonym wrote (05 Oct 2011 10:21:28 GMT) : >> I'd like to understand better the "should be safe" assertion. >> Other than valid time, what conditions are needed for Tor to consider >> a consensus as "verified"?
> From my skim of the Tor sources it seems: [...] => so IMHO the current state of this branch (5a2b5c0) is fit for merging into devel. Missing design doc update, though, but I'm commited to do it. bye, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Do not be trapped by the need to achieve anything. | This way, you achieve everything. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
