Hi, (Meta: it feels a bit useless to reply now that you've already sent this proposal to the debian-live mailing list: next time, please either make it very clear your deadline is that tight, or wait a bit more. Considering existing proposals were waiting for many months to be seriously reviewed and further thought, I would have been glad to enjoy a few more days to think about the shiny brand new proposal before things are done in a rush the way it's been.)
anonym wrote (14 Nov 2011 12:52:20 GMT) : > There must be a misunderstanding here. I believe it must have to > with some of: Thanks for clarifying. > I'm definitely open for a name change, but ".mount" isn't very > generic or intuitive either. I was also thinking about ".keep", but > I don't know. Maybe "live-persistence.list", following the style of > /etc/live-snapshot.list? I think I like that: "list which > directories should be persistent in the live system -- > live-persistent.list" Looks good. Why not even live.persist or live.persistent? Cheers, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | We're dreaming of something else. | Something more clandestine, something happier. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
