11/16/2011 12:03 AM, intrigeri: > Hi, > > (Meta: it feels a bit useless to reply now that you've already sent > this proposal to the debian-live mailing list: next time, please > either make it very clear your deadline is that tight, or wait a bit > more.
I'm sorry. To my defense, I must say that I interpreted your "Looks like it would perfectly suit our needs" a bit too eagerly. > Considering existing proposals were waiting for many months to > be seriously reviewed and further thought, I would have been glad to > enjoy a few more days to think about the shiny brand new proposal > before things are done in a rush the way it's been.) My thought was that we may get valuable input from that mailing-list during the same time. Honestly, I do want this to be done properly. > anonym wrote (14 Nov 2011 12:52:20 GMT) : > >> I'm definitely open for a name change, but ".mount" isn't very >> generic or intuitive either. I was also thinking about ".keep", but >> I don't know. Maybe "live-persistence.list", following the style of >> /etc/live-snapshot.list? I think I like that: "list which >> directories should be persistent in the live system -- >> live-persistent.list" > > Looks good. Why not even live.persist or live.persistent? live.persist is better. And the dot is probably not a good idea, now when I think about it. Easier to get right so you don't mount the media on / instead whatever the list file says. Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
