04/11/2012 09:50 AM, intrigeri: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (10 Apr 2012 18:43:15 GMT) : >> I just want to emphasize that since tails-greeter and persistence >> finally is here we really should finish all the things that >> essentially have been in a "wait until tails-greeter/persistence is >> done"-state. Some of these are rather trivial [1] but some are (at >> least potentially) a bit more involved [2]. Personally I'd like to >> see a relatively early >> 0.12 with as many of these bits and pieces in place as possible. > > Maybe we should focus on this 0.12 first, and move my proposal to > post-0.12? Doing this would both speed up 0.12 release, and allow us > to collectively focus on similar topics both in the 0.11..0.12 times, > and in post-0.12 ones, instead of spreading our energies around. > > However, working on such a 0.12 release now, given the Wheezy freeze > expected date (June) would draw much of the energies that we could > have put into building and testing upon live-build 3.x and Wheezy > before the freeze. To my eyes, this is a major drawback of such > a rescheduling. > > Alternatively, if we focus on the infrastructure and surroundings at > post-0.11 time, we can set a deadline to mid-June, probably most of > the work will be done by then, and then 0.12 could happen end of July. > Is 0.11 + 3months early enough? I think it is.
Perhaps. A compromise would be to get the more or less trivial ones (i.e. the tails-greeter controls for windows camouflage etc.) out quickly in the first point-release, which I don't expect to suck up much energy (they seem like good procrastination targets to me :)). And as soon as Vidalia 0.4 goes stable we fix bridge mode since that already is listed in your vision. Good enough? Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
