anonym wrote (11 Apr 2012 09:07:26 GMT) : >> Alternatively, if we focus on the infrastructure and surroundings >> at post-0.11 time, we can set a deadline to mid-June, probably most >> of the work will be done by then, and then 0.12 could happen end of >> July. Is 0.11 + 3months early enough? I think it is.
> Perhaps. A compromise would be to get the more or less trivial ones > (i.e. the tails-greeter controls for windows camouflage etc.) out > quickly in the first point-release, which I don't expect to suck up > much energy (they seem like good procrastination targets to me :)). I can live with this compromise, but the result should not be called a point-release IMHO: instead, it would be a tiny 0.12, that would be out quickly with only a few new features. Also, doing so implies being extra careful when working on tails-greeter (or switch to stable/testing/devel branches there too): if we go this way, only stuff that is fit for a quick release should be merged into tails-greeter master. Longer-term work shall happen in topic branches. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
