Hi, Alessandro Grassi wrote (03 Dec 2012 17:24:23 GMT) : > 2012/12/1, intrigeri <[email protected]>: >> Any clean (i.e. non-torsocks) way to make it use SOCKS instead? > There isn't any socks-specific code, but it uses QNetworkProxy class > which supports socks5 too. A patch should be doable.
Looks promising! I've not looked very far, but I have not found any upstream bug tracker. Did you find one? >> One should think of potential security issues and anonymity problems. > I will have a look at network requests with wireshark, to see what > happens and what gets sent. Any other idea/method? It would be great to look for possible more or less persistent indentifiers, at least those that may be stored in the filesystem. >> Also, I'd like to be sure we're not affected by Debian bug #666773. > That problem happened to me sometimes, but I'm unsure if it's your bug > or my bad internet connection. I will check if I see the triple "about > to finish" message in console, which looks like the bug's signature. Awesome! Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
