Hi, adrelanos wrote (30 Jun 2013 14:01:04 GMT) : > intrigeri: >> If bridge mode (or whatever the censorship circumvention / Tails >> detection protection option is called) is enabled, then yes. Would you >> be willing to prepare a patch to our design/implementation doc that >> makes this clear?
> I am happy to look at it. Great! >>> Apart from this, I also made the suggestions, if Tails wanted to have to >>> have a good portion of more clearnet traffic instead of having only Tor >>> traffic, Tails could run an untorified mainstream Linux distribution in >>> chroot or in a VM. >> >> It's unclear to me how useful this is in practice. >> Any pointer to reasoning / research on this topic? > A conclusion I got from "[tor-talk] Research paper "The Parrot is Dead: > Observing Unobservable Network Communications", was: "if you want to > look like http/https/ssh/etc. the only feasible method is, use the > implementation itself, not trying to mimic it". > I conclude, if Tails wants to look like Debian, the most promising > approach is to use Debian. I see. What is true at the connection level might not hold system-wide, though. The change of scale does not look obvious to me. Tails *is* using Debian already, by the way :) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
