Hi, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (27 Aug 2013 17:44:16 GMT) : > The installer doesn't actually specify that the persistent storage will > be kept. This seems to be an important UX problem.
Agreed. > A suggestion would be to have Tails USB Installer look at the USB stick > and see if there's already a persistence volume. If there is, it should > warn you that the Tails OS will get overwritten but the persistence > volume will remain the same. This looks slightly over-engineered to me. > Otherwise, without even changing the logic, the installer could have a > line somewhere saying that the persistent storage will not be erased. I like it: let's just add something along the lines of "Any persistent volume on this stick will remain unchanged" (rephrased by our Great Master of the Style Guide :) at upgrade time, regardless of whether persistence is present or not. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
