On 03/09/13 19:01, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > [email protected] wrote (27 Aug 2013 17:44:16 GMT) : >> The installer doesn't actually specify that the persistent storage will >> be kept. This seems to be an important UX problem. > > Agreed. > >> A suggestion would be to have Tails USB Installer look at the USB stick >> and see if there's already a persistence volume. If there is, it should >> warn you that the Tails OS will get overwritten but the persistence >> volume will remain the same. > > This looks slightly over-engineered to me. > >> Otherwise, without even changing the logic, the installer could have a >> line somewhere saying that the persistent storage will not be erased. > > I like it: let's just add something along the lines of "Any persistent > volume on this stick will remain unchanged" (rephrased by our Great > Master of the Style Guide :) at upgrade time, regardless of whether > persistence is present or not.
Created ticket #6258 to track this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
