intrigeri wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:12:44 GMT) : > as I said on #6595: > Tails has been allowing cookies by default for a while (treating it > all as session ones, though). Also, Torbutton allows to protect > individual cookies (when it's not broken: #6464), covering some of the > corner cases.
> So, I wonder why we are still shipping the Cookie Monster extension. > Does anyone know of valid usecases that it helps supporting? Of any > real-world usage of this extension? (I don't.) > If we can't find any, then I propose we drop this extension to make > our design simpler, closer to the TBB's, and to avoid potential future > issues when upgrading the browser. At the public meeting tonight, nobody had any real-word use case for this extension. Unless someone provides that real soon, I'll prepare a branch to remove it. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
