26/05/14 15:23, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:38:40 GMT) : >> In other words, a s/usewithtor/torsocks/ is all that's needed, right? > > That would be my guess too, but I did not test it. > >> Given your two responses to this pull request, should I take it that you >> reviewed this branch? > > Until now, I had only read Alan's email and reviewed the t-p-s branch. > >> Would you do the remaining review and the merge if >> I prepare a branch with a new t-p-s snapshot? I don't really want to put >> more things on your plate, so I think we can survive without this until >> the next Tails release. Alternatively, if Alan fixes this in time I'll >> hopefully have the time to do the review'n'merge, but I'd rather see him >> work on #6342. > > I'd like to see this branch merged in 1.1, else it'll be postponed for > 3 months, and I'd rather not see it bitrot for that long, and worked > on again in a hurry 3 days before the 1.2 freeze. > > So, I think I'll simply take care of bringing this branch in > a mergeable state (looks like only "details" are left), and will leave > the review'n'merge to you, so that 1. Alan can focus on #6342, which > feels way more important; and 2. we can free some of our collective > plate and mental space.
Ok, whichever way suites you best. Please revert 24e0293; I'll build a new package no matter what so you don't have to upload a snapshot .deb either, at least not for my sake. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
