Hi, anonym wrote (12 Jun 2014 21:39:16 GMT) : > IMHO using yelp for the documentation was more elegant, since it's much > more light-weight than the Tor Browser. I find it slightly confusing to > have a way to open the Tor Browser that bypasses our wrapper (if Tor > isn't working). yelp being dedicated for this one task makes all this > clearer for the user.
Agreed. > As I said, the current situation is fine as a workaround, but I think we > should aim at getting back yelp at some point. Yes, *iff* using Yelp for a very marginal usecase doesn't force us to add too many kludges (18-fix_offline_website_css_for_yelp comes to mind), or to implement too many upstream fixes ourselves (we had to fix #7285 ourselves there). Things would certainly look different to me if we had a C/Glib programmer or three on board. Anyway, created #7409 to address this, gave it #7285 and #7390 as children, and downgraded all that to Normal priority. Fair enough? Cheers! -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
