13/06/14 01:21, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (12 Jun 2014 21:39:16 GMT) : >> IMHO using yelp for the documentation was more elegant, since it's much >> more light-weight than the Tor Browser. I find it slightly confusing to >> have a way to open the Tor Browser that bypasses our wrapper (if Tor >> isn't working). yelp being dedicated for this one task makes all this >> clearer for the user. > > Agreed. > >> As I said, the current situation is fine as a workaround, but I think we >> should aim at getting back yelp at some point. > > Yes, *iff* using Yelp for a very marginal usecase doesn't force us to > add too many kludges (18-fix_offline_website_css_for_yelp comes to > mind), or to implement too many upstream fixes ourselves (we had to > fix #7285 ourselves there). Things would certainly look different to > me if we had a C/Glib programmer or three on board. > > Anyway, created #7409 to address this, gave it #7285 and #7390 as > children, and downgraded all that to Normal priority. Fair enough?
Ok. I must admit I wasn't aware of those complications. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
