Hi, On 28/02/15 09:47, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Alexander Mette wrote (27 Feb 2015 18:02:50 GMT) : >> I propose two patches to provide additional OpenPGP off-line paper key >> backup functionality that you can find attached to this e-mail. > > Yay, thanks a lot! \o/ > >> First one adds the paperkey package as explained in > >> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8957 > >> to allow printing out secret keys in as short and easily retrievable >> form as possible. > > I've flagged that one as Ready for QA, for the next major Tails > release (1.4). You can do this yourself next time. The gory details > are documented there: > > https://tails.boum.org/contribute/merge_policy/#index2h1 ok, sounds good.
> Any taker for the review, or does this fall into the fallback case, > that is on the release manager's plate? > > [Meta: since it's -- I believe, very sorry if I'm forgetting past > contributions -- Alexander's first code contribution, I would find it > very nice and welcoming if his patches were reviewed promptly.] Many thanks for the warm welcome! And yes, it's my first contribution to Tails. If my handle sounds familiar to you, it might be due to a patch I submitted for backupninja some time ago. >> The second patch adds support for more printers via the gutenprint >> (formerly gimp-print) drivers. [...] > > Please file a dedicated ticket for that one. Done: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8994 > Once my following question has been answered, you may directly flag > that ticket for 1.4, as Ready for QA, and pointing back to this thread > so that the reviewer can easily find your patch. Will do. >> It pulls in libgutenprint2 and overall costs about 8.2MB. I do think >> it's worth it though to provide a properly air-gapped system for >> secure generation and backup of PGP keys that never has to connect >> to the internet. > > Is this number (8.2MB) the increase of the resulting ISO size, when > compressed with the default (slooooow but very efficient) settings, > or anything else? Oooh, right, sorry for the confusion. This number is the sum of the sizes of the packages (printer-driver-gutenberg and libgutenprint2) as reported by "aptitude show <packagename>". Should I find out about actual increase in ISO size or do we trust the compression handling this efficiently enough? cheers amette > Cheers, > -- https://amette.eu [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
