On 03/03/15 10:02, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Alexander Mette wrote (02 Mar 2015 23:50:17 GMT) : >> On 28/02/15 09:47, intrigeri wrote: >>> Is this number (8.2MB) the increase of the resulting ISO size, when >>> compressed with the default (slooooow but very efficient) settings, >>> or anything else? >> Oooh, right, sorry for the confusion. This number is the sum of the >> sizes of the packages (printer-driver-gutenberg and libgutenprint2) as >> reported by "aptitude show <packagename>". Should I find out about >> actual increase in ISO size or do we trust the compression handling this >> efficiently enough? > > I've built from our experimental branch with this package added, > and it didn't result in *any* growth of the resulting ISO > => please flag the ticket you've created for 1.4, marked as Ready for > QA, and pointing back to this thread so that the reviewer can easily > find your patch. Awesome, that's great news!
But am I missing something or do I lack the rights to edit the ticket? Clicking on "Edit" opens up a comment form, but I do not see any possibility to change the Status or QA Check fields. thanks amette > Thanks! > -- https://amette.eu [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
