anonym wrote (03 Jun 2015 11:59:20 GMT) : > On 06/03/2015 12:38 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> sajolida wrote (01 Jun 2015 11:31:18 GMT) : >>> anonym: >>> Couldn't we add an extra number only when we do an >>> emergency release? >> >> I think we can, and we should.
> Let's just be clear on that it is the action of adding an extra *last* > number for emergency releases only that fixes the issue that intrigeri > originally raised. Right. Let's wait a bit for more feedback before making the final decision. > Any way, the point I'm trying to make is, if we do what you propose, > then we lose the control of the first number, and cannot use it for > our own visions. Do we care? I think we care, which invalidates that crazy idea of mine IMO. >>> As you can see, I'm generally more tempted to have version numbers >>> relevant for the user than for us. >> >> This seems to be one point we disagree about in theory, but I'm sure >> we can find consensual solutions when looking at the practical aspects :) > I'm in the middle. I think the even/odd scheme already improves the > situation for our users (e.g. makes them more readable and easier to > distinguish) even with the *potential* version skipping, so I think it's > a good compromise. +1 Cheers! -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
