sajolida wrote (04 Jun 2015 12:33:23 GMT) : >>> Regarding what we have been doing on our roadmap for 2.0 and 3.0 (give >>> them broad objectives) we could maybe do the same again: give us broad >>> directions for our work within a Debian lifetime. >> >> I don't really understand what this idea/proposal means in practice.
> We defined 2.0 and 3.0 maybe three years ago and we still don't know > when we'll get there. My proposal here is to have more "time-based" > objectives and define broad objectives in sync with Debian lifetime. But > I think this is outside of the scope of this discussion. Ah, OK. Indeed. Summit agenda++, maybe? :) Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
