Hi, anonym wrote (16 Jun 2015 13:11:44 GMT) : > On 05/21/2015 05:38 PM, sajolida wrote: >> So would it then make sense to hash: >> >> hash(Tails device secret, N bits of gateway MAC, SSID) >> >> Of course, I'm simplifying here to Wi-Fi only as there is no notion of >> SSID with wired connections. But you know, wire is deprecated :)
> If there's no SSID, like on wired connections, we just set a default > SSID of the empty string or whatever. I like this idea. sajolida, are you up to integrating it into the blueprint, or should anonym or I do it? >> On another topic, I found the shortcut to the 6 number a bit too quick. >> How do you go from "between 500 and 2000 Tor relays" and "N=6 → 64 >> possible Tor states"? > We do not really have any solid reasoning here. We need to make a > worst-case analysis for how N affects the probability of picking > compromised guards in a Tor network where C out of G guards are > compromised (and in the control of our local attacker). Yep, the goal is to pick the smallest possible N that still leaves room for enough persistent Tor states. Cheers! -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
