intrigeri: > flapflap wrote (03 Nov 2015 20:21:35 GMT) : >> What's the reason to mention "circuits and connections"; wouldn't just >> "circuits:" suffice? To me, this sounds redundant... > > Note that a circuit may be established without being used for > a connection (technically: a stream) yet.
Exactly, in the screenshot for example: - PiratenNDS2,AxleRelay3,DFRI3 is circuit - irc.oftc.net:6697 is a connection Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
